Smart contracts as public and natural phenomena

The concept of Smart contract as a public and natural phenomenon is being used by some people as if it were a given, while others are not familiar with it. The difference between these two groups is quite significant and needs to be discussed further. 0xtkgshn tweeted about this topic on July 29, 2022, and you can find the tweet here(https://twitter.com/0xtkgshn/status/1552814867694104576?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw).

Perhaps deploying Smart controllers and having a Sense of Deployment to the World means designing applications as Public Goods, where the application runs almost indefinitely with minimal running costs (mostly covered by gas fees from end users) and incorporates network effects. It raises the question of where the accumulated funds go, and the answer is likely to be mostly personnel expenses. 0xtkgshn also tweeted about this on July 28, 2022, and you can find the tweet here(https://twitter.com/0xtkgshn/status/1552617676799115264?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw).

I was searching frantically because I wondered if this meaning (deploying a benevolent Smart controller as a natural phenomenon to the Public) was included in the definition of "product"! I absolutely admire 0xtkgshn's perspective and support it wholeheartedly. However, the reality is that the majority of products in the space are based on issuing self-serving coins or NFTs and making profits through interest rates. 401noname tweeted about this on July 28, 2022, and you can find the tweet here(https://twitter.com/401noname/status/1552625690968616960?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw).